I see this question has been asked on the longer thread, but thought I would respond here.
Contraception post-ectopic
This is the age old dilemma I am afraid. And it’s one that affects post-ectopic women.
Coils/IUDs
Whilst coils/IUDs are renowned as being brilliant for preventing pregnancy in the uterus they aren’t so clever at preventing pregnancy elsewhere. In fact they can’t prevent pregnancy elsewhere.
With a coil, sperm and egg can still meet in the fallopian tube, and fertilisation can and often does take place. When things then progress as they should and the egg arrives in the uterus, the coil makes it a hostile place and so conception doesn’t then continue because implantation can’t happen. The egg expires and is passed in normal menstrual blood (you can’t see it, it’s smaller than a pinprick, in fact not visible to the naked eye). The problem with a coil is, if you have a damaged tube(s) and the fertilised egg gets stuck the fallopian tube will temporarily be an environment where implantation can take place (though it shouldn’t) and it can result in a subsequent tubal ectopic pregnancy.
A Mirena Coil is thought to be more suitable than one of the other coils because it releases a small dose of progesterone - progesterone prevents ovulation in a lot of instances (but not all unfortunately it’s not foolproof and women do become pregnant with a Mirena in situ). However a Mirena coil is a progesterone only contraceptive, and these are contra-indicated for women with a history of ectopic pregnancy.
**Progesterone Only Contraceptives** (POCs) are associated with a higher incidence of ectopic pregnancy. The advice of our medical advisers here is as follows:“delaying conception is advisable because we know one of the actions of synthetic progesterone is to thicken the mucal secretions of the fallopian tubes and we have no definitive information on how long it takes for this action to be reversed and so believe it may contribute to ectopic pregnancy.”
There is no definitive research to refute or verify this hypothesis but the advice is based on the knowledge we do have about the actions of synthetic progesterone and its known link to ectopic pregnancy.
Progesterone Only Contraceptives include contraceptive implants (if used we recommen delaying conception for several months after removal), the mini-pill or progesterone only pill, contraceptive injections (such as depo provera) and the Mirena Coil.
In control groups, women on the combined oral contraceptive were no more likely to suffer ectopic pregnancy, when they stopped taking it, than women who were not on the pill in the first place - thus suggesting that the oral combined contraceptive pill is NOT linked to ectopic pregnancy. There was a noted increase in the rate of women who suffered ectopic pregnancy if they became pregnant whilst taking the progesterone only contraceptive pill however, and it is now listed as one of the precautions in the product data. Likewise, the Morning After emergency contraceptive pill is now available as a progesterone only pill and there is an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy with this form of contraception. Again it is noted in the product data.
Phew. Bet you wished you’d not asked now! For women with a history of ectopic pregnancy, unless the risk outweighs the potential benefits, we stick with barrier methods (cap, condom, diaphragm, femidom), the combined oral contraceptive or Natural Family Planning.
However, when it comes down to it, with all contraception you and your clinician have to ask yourselves the same question - do the benefits of this to me as an individual outweigh the risk?
I hope that helps.
Kind regards
EPT Host 11